Have you noticed the Dems hypocrisy over tax reform? I have heard several talk about how Trump’s tax reform plan would burden our grandchildren with further increases in the national debt. Where were these hypocrites when Obama singlehandedly doubled the combined national debt of all previous presidents together?
Now I’m reserving judgment on whether the tax plan is good or bad until more details are presented. However, from what I’ve gleaned so far, it looks like I may get screwed. As a single non head of household it looks like my taxes would increase. I don’t like the lowest bracket being 12% and 25% kicking in at $35,000 or so. That would be a massive tax increase. We need to see more details.
Today on The Five during a discussion of Trump’s tweets against the failure of the DOJ to investigate the Clintons and others in conjunction with a whole host of things — most recently the rigging of the Democratic primary and money laundering to avoid campaign finance laws — Dana said it shows our independent judiciary. That’s just plain stupid. DOJ is not part of the judiciary. It is part of the executive branch. And just like the President is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, he is also the chief law enforcement officer in the country. The Attorney General serves at his pleasure and reports to him. Previous presidents have ordered the prosecution of individuals, and I’d like to tell you who they are as I’m positive that I read about them in an article by Andrew McCarthy I think, but now when I search for the subject I get a of non responsive bunch of junk which leads me to question whether this is another example of search engines being programmed to cover up certain things.
Juan Williams spouted his normal democratic talking points and kept trying to suggest we can’t allow a president to prosecute his opponents. While that might sound good as a talking point, it’s nonsensical when you consider that the actions being talked about are all things that Hillary and the Obama administration did and covered up to protect Hillary’s candidacy and Obama’s legacy. And it becomes transparently absurd when you consider that Trump is being investigated by his losing opponents.
Dana read the constitution before you pontificate.
First, how in the hell can the DNC be $24 million in debt? How can anyone other than a billionaire with billions in assets owe that much money? It’s inconceivable. Who lent them that much money with no collateral?
Now it came out today that due to that inconceivable situation, Hillary bought the DNC which led to the torpedoing of Bernie Sanders. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was in charge and incompetent. Hopefully the good people of Florida will finally kick her worthless ass to the curb next year. She has never responded to a hard question with anything even remotely intelligent.
Bernie got screwed. Now he’s a complete idiot, socialist and would never have won with his always failing ideology, but he should have at least had a fair chance to fail!
Wake up Dems and get your shit together! Your ideas are stupid and divisive, but at least you could run a fair primary. Hillary was and continues to be a lousy and incompetent politician.
If you haven’t seen it, you need to. First off her views and mine are quite similar so of course I’m going to love her show. We both believe both parties are only interested in protecting the elite political class.
Also if you didn’t see her interview of Justice Thomas, please do so!
I am tired of having to make this point, and I’m not going to do it again. However, I am sick and tired of having to point out the obvious. It’s not ‘radical Islam’. It’s Islam. The idiots killing our innocent citizens are following Islam not deviating from it. Allahu Akbar is not god is good, it’s our god is better than your god or my dad can beat up your dad. Islam preaches that everyone else is wrong and needs to be destroyed!
Another thing that I’m going to point out for the last time on this blog is that Congress needs to limit the scope of US District Court judges to issuing decisions limited to the federal circuit in which they sit. It’s absurd that’s single, unelected judge, and in most present cases appointed by Obama, can issue a decision that is binding nationwide. US Circuit Courts of Appeal issue decisions that are only binding in their circuit. Why should a lower court have broader power? It’s absurd! As I’ve pointed out previously, the most frequent way for a case to reach the Supremes is a split in the circuits. Under the Constitution, the Supreme Court has certain specified jurisdiction. All other federal courts are creations of Congress — with whatever jurisdiction Congress gives them. Congress needs to grow a pair and do its job and reign in this nonsense!
I don’t normally point out my previous predictions but there are a couple I just can’t pass up. First you will recall that early yesterday I said it wasn’t a coincidence that Meuller indicted folks after a week in which he was exposed as covering up collusion between Obama administration and the Russians with Uranium One and then last night Hannity said the same thing.
More importantly, I have been saying for years that the state and local tax deduction forces people to pay for the leftist policies of NY, NJ, IL, and CA. Over the weekend, Governor Cuomo oF New York said that any Congressman or Senator from New York who voted for repeal of this forced giveaway to socialism was committing treason. Nothing more need be said.
How will the idiots on the left turn a truck attack into a call for gun control? Don’t know but I believe they will.
Is it a coincidence that after a week in which it became clear that Hillary, Obama and Mueller were the folks actually colluding with Russia — remember Meuller was the FBI Director when they investigated and had evidence proving Russian bribery, kickbacks, money laundering and pay to play with the Clintons as part of a scheme to get control of a substantial portion of US uranium and covered it up to clear the way for the Obama administration to approve the sale — that Meuller suddenly decided to indict some folks? I think not!
There have been many calls, justifiably, over the past week for Meuller to recuse himself because of his and most of his team’s conflict of interest. To try to deflect attention from his obvious problems, he files some indictments. Someone needs to file ethics complaints against Meuller and end this charade. And Sessions needs to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate the Hillary email debacle; the pay to play through the Clinton Foundation; and Holder, Lynch, Comey, Obama, Meuller and the Clintons in the Uranium One scandal.
Lets level the playing field and investigate and indict the real criminals over the past 8 years!
P.S. It occurs to me that Meuller’s action was quite brilliant. Pressure was building to remove him, but now that he has issued indictments Trump would be removing him not from a wasteful, meaningless investigation but from an active prosecution. The obstruction of justice howls from the left would be deafening!
Ok a quickie here. I am not normally a conspiracy nut, but when it comes to the JFK assassination, I have questions. Now I have seen many documentaries about it and even a mock trial on it by top lawyers at an American Bar Association convention in San Francisco, however the point I always come back to is the magic bullet. A few months after the actual event, one of the major networks — at that time ABC, NBC or CBS — ran an hour long special to “prove” the viability of both Oswald being able to fire all the shots accurately in the timeframe established by the Magruder film but also that the magic bullet could have done what it was alleged to have done.
The network set up a mock up of the positions involved between Oswald and the Kennedy caravan. Now to test out the possibilities expert marksmen were used. Oswald as I recall was not an expert having only obtained the minimal military competence in marksmanship. As I recall the network had I think 3 expert sharpshooters try to fire three shots accurately in the actual time involved and I’m not positive but maybe one was able to do so. More importantly, the network had set up various blocks of matter that approximated the densities that the magic bullet would have had to go through to accomplish what that bullet supposedly did. They had their experts fire several rounds and only one even made it to the last block, and it didn’t come close to making it through that block. Now remember the magic bullet went through Kennedy twice and Connelly at least once and made it all the way through and ended up on the floor. The network without having any bullet make it through all blocks and exit declared that they had conclusively proved that the magic bullet did what it was it claimed to do. How in the hell do you declare a FAILED experiment proof of what it failed to do.
Lastly, I am very concerned that the FBI and the CIA still want to cover up documents over 50 years after the fact. Just ask yourselves why?
BTW, as I recall the magic bullet was found in almost pristine condition which is virtually impossible given its supposed path.
This is about the sorry state of college education in this country. It has been reported in several sources that college students are being affected by liberal/sociialist to the extent that they have no idea what they are talking about. Students at George Mason University were asked about the first one hundred days of the Trump administration and told what Obama did in his first one hundred days, the apology tour and the stimulus package etc., were what Trump did and they said it was disgusting and said Trump was a fascist. Later they were told that what Trump was proposing on tax reform was proposed by Bernie Sanders and they were for all for it after saying that that Trump’s tax plan was all wrong. In both cases after learning the realities they admitted that they really only were exposed to leftist sources and really had no idea what they were talking about.
That’s what’s really going on?